Friday 6 January 2012

Homework for next week - CONSTRUCTIONS OF CHARACTER

Please work through this for next Thursdays 1st session

If you were absent you will be expected to complete

3 analysis points


Intro

Paragraph 1,2 & 3

Conclusions


Focus on MES - EDIT - SOUND


Read over editing & writing about editing to help you know what to look for - there will be a quiz next week.... & the week after... and the week after that....

POST YOUR ANALYSIS (MIN 300 WORDS) & NOTES ONTO THIS BLOG POST AS COMMENTS


THE NOTES TO MAKE

THE CLIPS TO WATCH

THE QUESTION TO ANSWER


42 comments:

  1. Character Analysis

    What after watching two clips from the TV drama Sherlock Holmes I am going to demonstrate how Meadows portrays Sexuality through his characters, focusing on Mise en scene, editing and sound.
    In the first clip named ‘What do you mean gay’ we are introduced to the character Jim Moriarty. His sexuality is presented through mise en scene as he is wearing light colours and his top is tight to his skin, this indicates that he is feminine compared to Sherlock Holmes who is wearing a black suit blazer which is more masculine. This continues but through the sound as Meadows demonstrates these two characters to be opposite, Jim introduces himself. He has a high voice similar to a female voice and smothers Sherlock as he sounds excited to meet him “So your Sherlock Holmes” he is familiar with him before they have met. Although Jims voice tone is feminine the dialogue from Sherlock is the opposite, he replies ‘Gay’ he has a deep voice and instantly fires at Jim proposing that he is homosexual, Jim does not argue back this shows that Sherlock is the most powerful and dominant and quite obviously heterosexual. Sexuality is also shown through editing during the two characters conversation, the shot reverse shots and reaction shots express this. Throughout the time Jim is in the room he is always behind Sherlock and is not in the center of the screen, in their conversation Sherlock is always the main focus almost explaining that he is trying to ignore him and block him out, this can show how opposite they are. Jim wants conversation but Sherlock remains ignorant this could tie in with the fact that one is gay and one is straight and that Sherlock is most dominant because he has more time on screen.
    However in the next scene Jim is portrayed much differently and his sexuality changes, we can identify this by the mise en scene. Jim is now dressed in a smart black suit similar to Sherlock’s, now they are not so opposite and both are presented masculine they are fighting who is the archetype and both heterosexual. The prop also shows masculinity as Sherlock is holding a gun but what he doesn’t notice are snipers aiming on him, we can see the red dots from the rifle aiming on him overpowering him. In this tense scene there is constant masculinity being portrayed explaining that both the males are heterosexual the sound backs this up, through their conversation music is in the background, low and deep music but slow to build up the tension between these two characters and to exaggerate the situation with both characters at gun point. The dialogue in this scene also is important because when Jim enters the room this time he acts very different, his voice is now low and he introduces himself “Jim Moriarty…Hi!” he comments hi in the voice he spoke in before basically mocking what Sherlock thought he was like he is no masculine and clearly heterosexual he’s almost mocking the fact of being gay because he was faking the whole time. Lastly the editing also expresses the sexuality of these two characters, the camera shots are slow and steady as this is a tense conversation; the editing is calm because there is no action. I also spotted that there is the use of final shot, at the end of the clip he finds out that Jim wants to kill him now and Sherlock has his gun at the ready. He is the last person the audience is associated with because he is the most important but this also tells us that he will make a decision to fight back against Jim. These two characters are portrayed different at the start but then they are very similar and fighting who is most masculine and dominant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good effort Adam. Good analysis of how sexuality is constructed between the 2 characters through composition and screen time. All 4 areas are covered but don;t keave threads - points don;t follow with explanation of how this relates to stereotypes of gay or straight. Juxtaposition is considered as the characters being opposites or similar but think of how editing accomplishes this. How does editing work with MES to reveal the stereotypes of gay that Sherlock makes his deductions on? What does this tell us about him? terminology has improved. Well done

      AEE 13
      EX 16
      T 6

      Delete
  2. Sexuality and Gender: What stereotypes are used, what assumptions are made. What associations come to mind when you hear the word 'straight' and 'gay'
    How sexuality is being portrayed


    After watching two different clips from the tv drama Sherlock Holmes I am going to evaluate how Meadows portrayed sexuality through the characters by focusing on Mise en Scene, editing and sound.
    In the first clip called “What do you mean gay?” the audience are introduced to the character Jim who later turns out to be the Jim Moriarty being hunted by Sherlock Holmes and Watson. His sexuality is portrayed greatly by mise en scene. Jim is wearing a skin tight lightly coloured top which seems quite feminine especially when he stands next to Sherlock who is wearing a dark suit which is a lot more masculine. Also when both Sherlock and Jim speak you can again see the difference between Jim being more feminine and Sherlock being the more masculine. Jim speaks in a quite high pitched, feminine voice and seems quite excitable/emotional when meeting Sherlock, whereas on the other hand Sherlock does not greet Jim as enthusiastically as is more matter of fact and blunt when calling him “gay”. Also Sherlock’s voice is quite deep compared to Jims “So your Sherlock Holmes” which is quite a feminine thing to say when first being introduced to someone.
    I also noticed Sherlock’s instant judgement of Jim when he accused him of being gay, which also showed his homophobic belief. Also this made Sherlock more dominant as Jim did not reply to the accusation pointed towards him and just made a distraction and then changed subject before quickly leaving, which again is a feminine trait of leaving a situation when uncomfortable in and not causing a scene. Also we can tell Sherlock is the more dominant by the Camera shots and editing. There are more close-ups on Sherlock and more long shots on Jim, the long shots allows you to see how Jim is dressed and walks in the scenes which all were quite feminine. Also Sherlock was seen more throughout the clip showing he was the more dominant as he made more time on the screen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the second clip called ‘Sherlock meets Moriarty” Jim become much more masculine and a clear change in sexuality has been made from clip one. The mise en scene is one of the obvious places the change has happened. Now Jim is also wearing a suit similar to the one Sherlock is wearing in both clips, now both characters are masculine and are both fighting each other to be the more dominant. Also in this clip Sherlock pulls out a gun which allows him to become the more dominant and Jim also kept speaking in a high pitched voice throughout. Just after Sherlock pulls the gun out on Jim or Moriarty as we now know who is being hunted by Sherlock, have red laser markers on him and Watson. This means that they’re masculine has been challenged and overpowered. Also the setting is also questionable has to whether being masculine or feminine as they are in a gym or fitness centre and are all standing next to a pool. Also the use of sound is quite important to the scene as the music is slow and builds the tension and continues to play throughout the scene keeping the tension. Its quite slow and classical and deep sounding instruments mostly associated to men. In this scene the dialogue is important as Jim changes between using his natural deep voice and his mocking “gay”, feminine voice. This is clearly Jim showing his masculinity by mocking Sherlock for believing in his gay act. Also the editing shows the battle between the two characters for the masculinity in the scene. The camera shots consist more long shots to show the audience what is happening in the shots and to show how they are behaving, if they acting in a masculine way. There is a final shot at the end which could be an establishing shot of Sherlock to build the suspense for the audience and shows that Sherlock is holding the power at the end of the scene, he is the more masculine in that moment. This will also leave a lasting impression on the audience as he is the last character they would see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good effort Abbie. How does the editing work with the MES to identify the traits of homosexuality & what does this tell us about Sherlock? Key word to develop juxtaposition of shots - editing. Ensure you use words such as costume and location. Well done
      AEE 14
      EX 16
      T 5

      Delete
  4. Sexuality and Gender: What stereotypes are used, what assumptions are being made, what assumptions come to mind when you hear the word “Straight” or “Gay”

    After watching the first clip “What do you mean gay” we are almost instantly introduced to a character called Jim Moriarty, he enters the room in quite a camp fashion saying “Hi” to Sherlock in a shy way. Sherlock shows no interest in his presence and doesn’t bother to even look up to introduce himself showing his masculinity in the way that he doesn’t have time for people below him. Jim Moriarty is wearing a very tight bright coloured T shirt typically worn by the gay community, and compared to Sherlock wearing a black suit which is very masculine in the way that a suit is for business and work and the colour black is a very tough blunt colour also representing masculinity. Jim questions Sherlock politely if he is working on one of his cases showing interest when Sherlock shows none what so ever, also he mentions that he has “heard all about him” showing he has taken former interest in who Sherlock is, hinting that he may have a schoolgirl/boy crush on Sherlock. Sherlock takes a seconds glance at Jim and says quietly “gay” in a very low voice, Jim does not argue back to Sherlock’s accusation and this shows that Sherlock is the most powerful in the room and showing he is obviously heterosexual. The fact that Jim is constantly through the clip trying to get Sherlock’s attention and Sherlock’s only takes one glance at his for a split second may be suggesting that as they are complete opposites in interest to each other then maybe opposites in sexuality meaning Sherlock is Straight and powerful and Jim is Weak and homosexual. In the next scene Jim is portrayed in a very different way as he is introduced in the clip “Sherlock meets Moriarty *May contain spoilers*” he says “I gave you my number and I thought you might call” showing that he is definitely gay as that is something that you would say to someone that you have a physical attraction to and you wanted to keep in contact with showing his femininity as he is saying it to Sherlock who is definitely the masculine powerful one in the scene. The first shot of Jim Moriarty is a tense one as it blocks our vision and doesn’t allow us to see who is speaking in the camp manor to Sherlock maybe suggesting that Jim doesn’t really have a stern view on his own sexuality and may be bisexual also as in the first scene he is in a relationship with the female scientist working with Sherlock. The research I have done on these two Sherlock clips has given me definitive proof that Sherlock is the masculine figure throughout both clips showing he is the heterosexual, apart from the end of the second clip where the homosexual becomes the power even with a gun aimed at him, turning the stereotype on its head.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good effort James! Thorough analysis of the stereotypes of homosexuality and a detailed reading of how they are juxtaposed with Sherlock. Examples from dialogue, MES are string. Consider how the editing conveys power/normality through juxtaposition as well as screen time. How does editing work with the MES to reveal Sherlocks deductions of sexuality and what does this tell us about Sherlock? Improve your focus on editing to improve and apply terminology. Is Moriarty using this performance to lure Sherlock in? Well done.

      AAE 18
      EX 14
      T 4

      Delete
  5. In the first clip, Jim Moriarty is presented in a quite feminine costume of tight top and low trousers. Whereas, Sherlock is wearing a black suit and a shirt, which generally a more masculine way of dressing for a man. As Sherlock does not avoid pointing out that Moriarty is also using a lot of hair care products on his hair. Also he is acting in a feminine way. The way Jim Moriarty is walking in, and getting all excited about seeing Sherlock for the first time – his reaction is a slight jump and a higher pitched voice he puts on, which is typically associated with women’s form of showing excitement. Also he is so excited, he becomes all clumsy – also associated with how women are portrayed. Whereas Sherlock is calm and serious as men are usually portrayed in films and TV dramas. Sherlock calls Moriarty gay who clearly heard it but in the room, it is Sherlock of the higher power, so Moriarty does not argue back and appears as a subordinate character, usually also associated with women (being subordinate, men in higher power etc). When he leaves, Sherlock is acting ignorant and does not acknowledge his goodbye, carrying on whatever he is doing. This is also a sign of dominance and higher power over the homosexual appearing person, as Sherlock is a character of high masculinity. There are a lot of mid-close ups, and close-ups on characters faces to identify their feelings. Sherlock is clearly the dominant one here as camera and editing shows because he is shown the most to clearly underline his dominance and power in the room over the gay guy.
    In the next clip, Moriarty is presented as a very masculine, “man in the power” character. His identity switches 180 degrees, and he is a complete different person to what he was like in last scene. This clip is very tense because both men are masculine and there is a very high level of testosterone buzzing around the room. Sherlock and Moriarty are standing opposite each other. Sherlock has a gun, which would usually make him instantly more dominant than Moriarty but Moriarty outsmarts him by having snipers aiming at him from all corners. This gives us a lot to think about before deciding which of the males in more dominant in this scene. There camera shots are slow, steady and very “focused” you could say. They express the tense situation between the two males, both of them eying each other up and making assumptions and “reading each other” to predict the other one’s next move. Sexuality of both males are obvious now, both wearing similar costume, owning same kind of power and dominance, both using the power of their clever minds. The slow music in the background really sets the mood. It tells us that both characters are just as cold and can be heartless and that the situation in between them is tense.

    (491words)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good analysis of examples and identifying the construction of the stereotype of gay masculinity using juxtaposition. How does the editing work with the MES when Sherlock deduces he is gay? What does this tell us about Sherlocks abilities/power? Explain why do these aspects pointed out represent gay-ness?
      Terminology could be improved here to bring up marks substantially. Well done
      AAE 15
      EX 16
      T 4

      Delete
  6. PART 1 - Constructions of Character – Sexuality portrayed in Sherlock

    In these two scenes from Sherlock, the idea and re-presentation of sexuality is being portrayed largely by the mise-en-scene and also the dialogue between the characters. The character Jim Moriarty is clearly the object of wondering sexuality in the first scene as the audience see Sherlock’s first impression of him, by simply saying ‘gay’. Moriarty is presented in tight, low cut and light clothes which juxtapose Sherlock and John Watson’s dark suits and coats, and also Molly’s serious lab coat. Throughout the majority of the scene, the audience is given chances to question Moriarty’s sexuality particularly as you view how Moriarty focusses nearly all of his attention on Sherlock, not his ‘girlfriend’ and also on his entrance – he does not come into the room confidently, with a broad chest and a holding his head high. He comes into the scene with a little smile, and with feminine movements of his hands and a nervous disposition – his voice is also higher in tone, closer to Molly’s than either Sherlock or John’s. The character Moriarty makes a loud clanging noise as he attempts to secretly give Sherlock his phone number. I think this dramatic noise is also used to show the audience that the entrance of this character is important and needs to be acknowledged.
    The character Moriarty is definitely presented in this first scene as living up to the stereotype of a young gay man – what with the personal grooming which Sherlock so clearly points out and just the general surface image and style that the mise-en-scene supports. Obviously the close-up shots of Moriarty when Sherlock is explaining his reasons for calling him gay are important to define the character that the audience first sees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Skillful identification of the 3 areas of technical examples linked to stereotypes of 'gay-ness' with some good explanation. How does the editing show power/how does it work with the MES to demonstrate indicators of gayness & what does tis say about sherlocks power? Good effort.

      Delete
  7. PART 2 - Constructions of Character – Sexuality portrayed in Sherlock

    In the second chosen scene, the mise-en-scene used has given the story a darker twist and changed the relationship between the three male characters. Moriarty is now dressed in a suit to show he’s on par with Sherlock and that he’s not really the clumsy, feminine man dressed in beige shades that the audience saw earlier. We can see it was just a role that Moriarty was playing, including the aspect of him being homosexual. Moriarty’s accent is his own and he plays on the fact that the audience has seen him before, by saying ‘Gave you my number. I thought you might call’ in a very flirty tone to surprise Sherlock. To give the changing identity of Moriarty a bit more impact, the way the camera moves around him at his entrance is very mysterious, a main shot being an establishing shot that shows the distance between Sherlock and Moriarty – in the first few shots, the actual portrait of the character is unclear and hidden, perhaps to signify his own deception of character as well as keep the audience guessing and also interested. In the first scene, there is no music behind the arrival of Moriarty whereas in this scene, the music is tense which adds to the atmosphere and also changes the perception the audience originally had on the character. The sound suggests something sinister in him, as does the dim lighting which only reflects on the glimmer of the swimming pool. The audience quickly understands that Moriarty was playing a character as he says ‘playing gay, did you like the little touch with the underwear?’ and that he was living up to the stereotype of a gay man to fool the audience. The second scene is a slow edited piece which draws out and lengthens the tension between the characters and their situation and also contradicts the seriousness as Moriarty teases Sherlock ‘is that a …gun, or are you just pleased to see me?’ – playing on the idea that was portrayed in the first scene.

    In conclusion, Moriarty portrays himself in the first scene as being gay and lives up to the stereotype but in the second scene, he shows his true colours and real identity and also teases Sherlock about his own sexuality. I think Meadows purposely did this and executed these scenes in the way he did to highlight audiences’ general and initial perspective and opinion of sexuality and to therefore challenge it through the character of Jim Moriarty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent! A thorough & detailed analysis of how the sequence uses the performance of sexuality. Covers all 4 areas to support argument and explains well chosen examples linked to the question. Impressive. Well done
      Terminology can be improved

      AAE 18
      EX 16
      T 5

      Delete
  8. Analysis of sexuality in TV drama. (Sherlock.)

    In the clip "What Do You Mean Gay?" we are introduced to Sherlock, his side kick and a girl working in a lab. As they discuss things, another male (the females boyfriend enters). As this male converses with the others, Sherlock mumbles "gay" as a reference to this new male's sexuality. As he leaves, his bewildered girlfriend struggles to accept the possibility of her boyfriend being homosexual.

    In the video of Sherlock meets Moriarty, Sherlock enters a swimming pool room holding up what is believed to be a USB stick. He proudly boasts of how he knew what was coming. John enters and opens his trench coat to reveal a bomb (I think.) There is very low key lighting as most of the lights are in the pool with very few lights in the room, this is because it is set at night and gives the scene a thriller-ish feel. "I gave you my number, I thought you might call." is heard from around the room. The scene deadpans over to a man who's face is half hidden behind the pillars. The man walks out but we cannot see him immediately as the view is of the pool. The man predicts that Sherlock has a fun and behaviours in a feminine manner. "or are you just pleased to see me?" This is considered a very homosexual thing to do as hetreosexual men often don't tend to be looking at other males' trousers. It is an over the shoulder shot from Sherlock so we can see the man standing there who is revealed to be Jim Moriarty. Jim has the power as he is standing in the light, this breaks the stereotype of hetreosexual men being the ones with the power. As in this scene the assumed homosexual has the power.

    As Jim walks over he reveals his plans to Sherlock and told him "don't be silly, someone else is holding a rifle, i don't like to get my hands dirty." Whilst it is a very feminine quality to not want to get dirty, Jim still maintains the power in the scene. Jim is also in a suit, whilst the other two are in a shirt and casual clothes. Jim also calls Sherlock 'dear', another feminine quality. However whilst speaking to Sherlock, Jim gets annoyed and shouts "thats what people DO." Shouting is a way of getting authority, this could be considered a masculine quality. The music is very suspenseful and isn't very loud until intense moments, like when Jim is in the headlock. "Very good." Even in the weaker position, Jim is still very gloaty and holds the power, despite a gun being aimed at his head. "Gotcha" and then wipes himself down, Jim shows that no matter what he has the power throughout the scene. Jim is shorter and in his conversation, he is shot in a high angle whilst Sherlock is shot in a low angle shot, to show that Jim still has the power. When Jim leaves, he sings no you won't. Singing could be a feminine quality yet still Jim has power. Then Sherlock rushes around panicing which could be seen as feminine whilst John falls to the floor gasping for breathe. Jim then re enters in the background whilst Sherlock faces the other way. Lasers are then pointed at both Sherlock and John and Sherlock turns and points his gun once again at Jim and then the floor and shoots the bomb. Shooting the bomb is a very irrational thing to do so could be seen as feminine. The scene then ends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some relevant points here, however what aspects are seen as homosexual in the mise-en-scene in the first clip? why does Sherlock think he is gay and what does this reveal about Sherlock? Editing needs to be addressed here particularly. Does he still come across as a stereotypical homosexual - threatening, dangerous, violent, a villain? Why does he adopt this act earlier, has his performance changed? Look more carefully next time Joe, a lot of this is descriptive but it must explain and analyse meaning - shooting the bomb is decisive rather than irrational - its Jim who changes his mind at the end. Get your terminology correct high angle = weak, low angle = powerful

      AAE 14
      EX 13
      T 4

      Delete
  9. Clip one
    In the first clip sexuality is presented by mus-en-scenes and dialog. Jim is presented as a 'gay' the clothes he is wearing,(tight clothes) feminine colours and as Sherlock says his personal grooming is high (not what a man is expected to do). This is also shown in the dialog. Jim's voice and the way he talks is higher toned and feminine. The way he greets “So your Sherlock Holmes” he is familiar with him before they have met before.
    Whereas Sherlock is more different. His dressed in a black suit more darker manly colours. He doesn't approach Jim in the same excited way; he just concentrates on his work. That is more what a man is expected to do.
    Jim's attention is on Sherlock more than his girlfriend as well. When Jim knocks the tray typically to give him his number without anyone noticing, however trying to attract Sherlock that he has given his number by making loads of noise.
    Also the way he says bye to Sherlock is feminine he stands and waits for a reply looking at him in a gaze. Like a woman would do waiting for someone they like to say bye back.
    From when Jim enters the audience clearly will stereotype him as gay because of his body language, clothes and the way he talks towards Sherlock. There is a big difference between them. Sherlock is dominating and manly however Jim is girly and feminine.

    Close ups on Sherlock to see his expression on his face let the audience know he is not interested and annoyed because he is gay, and long shots on Jim, so the audience can see the way he acting around Sherlock, his clothes and to see from his body language he is coming across as a gay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These show importance and therefore Sherlocks status. Where is the analysis of the second clip - you cannot complete your comparison without this.

      Not yet completed.

      Delete
  10. Sexuality & Gender:
    In the first clip, Sherlock analyses Jim’s like he does with everyone he meets. In general, we notice Jim dresses quite casual, however his top fits well to his torso indicating to me that this character clearly cares about his appearance. When Sherlock analyses Jim, he know Jim is gay by how he is dressed, his hair and his underwear. We know this as Sherlock lists these things as well as saying, “with that level of personal grooming” which gives us the assumption is he is gay. However, this could be also misinterpreted as being metro sexual if the character Jim hadn’t left his number for Sherlock under a dish.
    Sherlock’s outfit is smart business dress which shows his importance as well as him work with science equipment which shows he knows a great deal of knowledge which also shows power. This also shows he is masculine as by having knowledge means power and power is normal associated with masculine traits within a person. Sherlock has a deep, very clear English tone of voice and it being this deep show he has a powerful masculine voice which shows he is dominant and the higher social class in this sequence.
    When Sherlock is analysing Jim, the cuts are fast, short and the shots are extreme close ups which gives impact to the viewer as these are details we would not pick up on. Fast, short cuts are normally associated with masculine figures. As these shots are also going to one to the other there is a slicing/swishing sound to indicate the speed he is analysing the character.


    The second clip the music sets the atmosphere straight away, with the background of water from the swimming pool. There is also a heart beat in the soundtrack which builds up tension. The echo’s also show it is isolated. You also hear the click of the gun the Sherlock is holding at Moriarty which means Sherlock is preparing to shot. This is also a very manly sound as guns are related to being dominant and powerful which is a masculine trait. Sherlock has a gun in his hand through the whole sequence of the clip which is associated with being masculine.
    Sherlock again is in a smart business suit which shows his powerful masculine figure. Moriarty is also wearing a suit however certain aspects of Moriarty shows you that he is more feminine then masculine. Moriarty has a higher tone of voice which gives of a more feminine vibe to his character.
    Moriarty says the line, “I gave you my number, I thought you might call”. The way he delivers this line is a high tone, in a woman sort of way as if he is flirting some what with Sherlock. The line itself also indicates that this character maybe gay as he gave Sherlock his number and he never called which relates to women giving their number to men and the men not returning the call to show he’s not interested. Moriarty is also well groomed which is another stereotype of a person who is gay. Moriarty also seems very playful in his tone of voice and normally being playful is more a feminine trait.
    The cuts between this scene aren’t as fast more smooth and simple. The cuts do change to be a bit fast when John holds Moriarty. There is also a transition when Sherlock turns around to point the gun at Moriarty. Moriarty is the focus until you see the transition which is blurring Moriarty out and making the gun the focus.

    From these two sequences it is clear who is Masculine, Feminine, Straight, Gay or Bisexual. Sherlock throughout this has shown to be a masculine, straight, powerful figure where as Moriarty seems to be the more feminine, gay/bisexual sneaky character who uses ways that a women might use to get Sherlock into a tough situation. These are very clear and definite. The Stereotypes of these two characters are strong in the clips.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent effort! Well linked analysis of sexuality with the technical areas as well as discussing how this is used to build the characters and narrative. Homosexuality is represented as both weak/femninine and also threatening and unpredictable. He could be argued to be mocking Sherlocks deductions and first impressions of him as gay. Editing could be developed into screen time and that Sherlock has more CUs to establish relationship with the audience - Jim is LS to keep enigma/ gay is kept at a distance. Well done!

      AAE 17
      EX 17
      T 6

      Delete
  11. Analysis of sexuality, stereotypes & character construction - Sherlock.

    In this analysis, I will be looking at the costume, props, sound and editing from the TV Drama series 'Sherlock; which i will link to sexuality, gender stereotypes and character construction.
    (1) In the first clip 'What Do You Mean Gay', it opens to the sound of alarms while Sherlock is looking at the computer screen. The abrupt alarms, and loudness is masculine, however when we are introduced to the next character Jim, this masculine sound ends, and there is the quieter sound of voices talking in the background.
    The costumes that they both wear show typical conventions of what their sort of character would wear. The protagonist, Sherlock, wearing a dark coloured suit, and John wearing a black jacket with dark red shirt are both masculine. This is a vast contrast compared to what Jim was wearing, being light coloured beige trousers, and a pale grey t-shirt. Not only are his costume tightly fitting, he is also wearing a V-neck t-shirt which is a typical stereotype of gay men. The posture of what Jim stands also is quite feminine, as he rests his hand on the back of his 'girlfriends' back, as he gazes at Sherlock while waits for a goodbye from Sherlock.
    Character construction and linking it to stereotypes is very important for the audience to see and understand where that person stands in the scene; to see who is more dominant, and powerful. Having these stereotypes helps us link it to the conventions, previously set by others, to know what that person is likely to do in the future of the film/clip. Knowing that Jim is stereotypically gay with feminine traits, makes us think that he is not a threat to the future of the programme.
    (2) During the second clip of the series 'Sherlock', we find there is a twist in what we were expecting, or a rather something that we definitely did not expect. Jim enters the scene of Sherlock and John by the poolside, wearing the opposite to what we saw earlier. Black suit, and white shirt similar to what Sherlock is wearing. The way which the character Jim acts has also changed. This new Jim is portrayed as a more masculine figure now. The dialogue and the way Jim speaks has changed to a more masculine lower pitch voice, compared to the softer voice we heard in the clip before.
    Sherlock yet again looks masculine, while wearing the black suit, and while using a masculine prop of a gun. However when Jim leaves and john and himself are alone, he drops his masculine guard in a moment of panic he starts to rip off the jacket from John. This panic, is rather a trait from females than men, which reverses the way which we see both Jim and Sherlock.
    Which brings us to the Judith Butler theory of that gender is an act or performance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good analysis of the MES and for decoding homosexuality as passive and no-threatening, however consider how the editing works with the shots and what this says about Sherlock and his power. Extend your analysis to include the camera angles and shot types used - cu on sherlock to ally us with him and further away from Jim to show he is 'other', unknown etc which is representing sexulaity as something other than being effeminite or gay - in essence he is playing with Sherlocks assumptions of stereotype. How does the editing juxtapose the 2? Without CAM, EDIT this will limit your marks. Well read about the Threat though.

      AAE 15
      EX 12
      T 4

      Delete
  12. What aspect of 'sexuality' portray through the characters of Sherlock and Jim Moriarty
    Clip 1 What do you mean gay
    this clip is set in a laboratory. In this clip sherlock Holmes is wearing a dark colored suit looking very smart and masculine. While the character of Jim Moriarty is wearing a t-shirt, low waisted jeans and is acting gay. Sherlock brought this point in to conversation once Jim had left he pointed out all the major factors of him that made him gay such as the clothing, his personal growing such as his eyebrows and the fact that he had left his number under a petri dish. sherlock holmes was very quick to steroetype Jim being gay which shows he is quick to look at all the factors and indentify the facts. The sound effects that where used in this clip was an alarm, the sound of the computer/typing, the doors opening. The sound of the alarm is very masculine before we get introduced to the character of Jim. There were lots of close ups of Jims 'gay' features which is also shown quickly as sherlock is telling the women about them as well as sherlock on the computer.

    clip 2 Sherlock Meets Moriarty
    this clip is located in a swimming pool. In this clip sherlock is also wearing a dark colored suit which has juxtaposition to Jim Moriarty who is wearing a light grey suit. Sherlock has long hair and has no tie on as well as carrying a gun showing his masculinity and power he has at the beginning of the clip. Where as Moriarty has short hair and a tie on looking very smart and not gay. He explains to sherlock that he was only acting gay.
    The sound effects in this clip was of the gun barrel being loaded, the door opening and the talking between the two characters. There were lights reflecting on to the pool shimmering across the water. there were shot reverse shots of the conversation between the two characters and a close up of the gun being loaded. Throughout the clip there was soft music being played but by the end there were big beats of drums and classical instruments adding to the tension.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alex, somewhat descriptive, you need to develop into analysis - what does all these aspects mean, why are they there? You must be more specific than 'and is acting gay' and 'not gay' what does this mean? - analysing and explaining this is after all what you are being examined on. How is homosexuality represented in the first clip and does this change in the second - is he threatening, feminine, weak, vain...? How does he come across in the second? Why is he acting - what is this giving us a clear indication of the role of 'camp'ness and actually being a homosexual - what does this say about stereotypical assumption society (Sherlock) makes? Without CAM, EDIT you are limiting you mark. To improve finish this scentence...Homosexuality is represented as...THreatening? Effeminite? Non threatening? Evil?

      AAE 12
      EX 12
      T 4

      Delete
  13. Sexuality, stereotypes and character construction -Sherlock
    In this analysis i will be focusing on the costume, props, sound and editing in the TV Drama Sherlock. in the first clip 'What Do You Mean Gay' it opens with Sherlock looking at the computer and the sound of alarms going off. The loud noises and the alarm can be seen as quite masculine. When Jim is introduced the sound fades out and becomes quieter.

    Looking at the costumes they wear shows the way you would think they would dress. John was wearing a black jacket with a red shirt, Sherlock had a dark suit, both of these costumes show them as masculine men in contrast to Jim who was wearing beige trousers and a grey shirt, his costume was tightly fitted. This can be stereotypically seen as being gay as people assume that men wearing tight clothes are gay.

    Character construction is important so the audience can understand the people in the scene, it makes them see who dominates and the power of each character. By the traits that we can tell of Jim makes him seem as not threat to the rest of the people throughout the programme. This is how it comes across in this scene, but we do not know as he is not a very forward character.

    In clip 2 we find that Jim is not what we expected him to be from seeing his previously. He is dressed completely opposite to how he was. Black suit and a white shirt much more masculine, also quite similar to how we see Sherlock looking. Jim's personality and the way he acts has changed, this makes the audiences perception on him differ as they see him more masculine. We see Sherlock acting masculine as he has a gun as a prop. When Jim leave John and Sherlock alone he drops his act of masculinity and acts in a panic. This is seen as feminine because it is expected for women to panic not men. We see both Jim and Sherlock as both masculine and feminine throughout.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good effort, develop your analysis by what you refer to as Jim not a threat extend this to how he is a representative of homosexuality and therefore homosexuality is non threatening, non powerful, vain? effeminite? How does this change when he becomes threatening? Without CAM, EDIT and greater detail in SOUND you limit your marks.

      AAE 15
      EX 13
      T 4

      Delete
  14. Analysis of Sexuality & Gender- Sherlock.

    For this analysis i will be mainly looking at the sound, props, costume and editing from the drama series - Sherlock.
    In the first clip, 'What Do You Mean Gay', Sherlock is focusing on a computer screen, when alarm sounds will occur. The alarms are quite masculine as they are loud, fast and abrupt although the alarm sound seems to die down when we are introduced to the next character, showing that the masculinity has ended and we hear the softer sounds of voices in the background.
    The costumes that they are wearing are stereotypically the type of costume you would assume that type of character would wear, Sherlock being one of the main characters in the clip is wearing a dark coloured suit and John, the second character is wearing typically the same type of professional wear - a black jacket with a red tie. In comparison to what Jim is wearing, there is a big change of costume, Jim is wearing a tightly fitted grey t-shirt and beige trousers, the t-shirt being tight fitted and also a V neck is basically a typical stereotype of a gay man. Another aspect that I noticed was that his stance was quite feminine, staring at Sherlock until he got a goodbye while resting his hand on his girlfriends back. Also after being quite clumsy, looks quite embarrassed and rubs his arm, a gesture that females tend to do while the typical masculine stereotype would not care. He also seems quite shy around Sherlock.
    If an audience want to find out how important a certain character is in the scene, character construction and linking it to stereotypes is important. The audience would be able to see what character is the most dominant and powerful and who is more subordinate. These types of stereotypes helps us to know what the person is likely to say or do in the future of the clip. Like with the character Jim, to know he is stereotypically gay by having feminine traits and acting like a feminine would- helps the audience to know if he is a threat or not.

    In the second clip of 'Sherlock' there is a twist that nobody would of expected, as Jim enters the location of the pool, wearing the complete opposite costume to what we saw earlier. Showing his more masculine side by wearing a black suit and a white shirt. Jim also speaks in a lower voice to the earlier clip. Sherlock still looks masculine, however this time carrying a gun, known to be a more masculine prop.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good explainiation of the stereotyping effemininte etc. Is this a positive or negative stereotype? If he is shy and clumsy therefore homosexuality is represneted as weak, non-threatening? - Does this change in the second sequence? Why? Good effort, but without CAM, EDIT you are limijting your marks, how does the editing juxtapose the characters, LS on Jim, CU on Sherlock why? Homosexuality as foreigh/'other'?

      AAE 15
      EX 13
      T 4

      Delete
  15. Sexuality and Gender: What stereotypes are used, what assumptions are made. What associations come to mind when you hear the word 'straight' and 'gay.’ How sexuality is being portrayed?
    I will begin to analyse Clip 1- 'What do you mean gay.’
    We are firstly introduced to the first character Jim Moriarty. Firstly you are able to see what he is wearing, miese en scene, he is wearing a gray v neck top which is tightly fitted and beige trousers. In contrast to the other two men wearing smart clothing, suit looking. Therefore making Jim look more feminine. Jim is very grateful to be meeting Sherlock Holmes and is more feminine when talking to him whereas Sherlock Holmes doesn’t really care or want him to be there. Sherlock is very blunt and rude with replying when he says ‘gay’ in a deep voice. Therefore he is making accusations and judgements before he really knows much about Jim. As another man has walked into ‘his territory’ he wants to come across domineering and powerful to state that he is the ‘alpha male.’ Jim does not reply to the gay comment, however when Sherlock does say ‘hey’ to Jim he becomes flustered and knocks something over. Showing how a girl would effectively act if she met someone famous. However this may mean that Sherlock is his idol and does not want to make a fool out of himself. Shot reverse shots are used to show the expressions within the conversation. When Jim says bye Sherlock does not reply or even turn back at him. Sherlock is generally placed in the centre and as he is wearing black in a lab he stands out more. You are able to tell Jim is trying to make a real effort but Sherlock is having none of it and continues to be rude and ignore Jim at sometimes. Showing Jim is more feminine as he keeps trying and persisting. Juxtaposition is used in areas to compare the two characters. Sherlock Holmes then surprises the two others in the room and he analyses Jim in depth for example about his ‘tinted eyebrows’ as the different shots come up the sound is sharp and the cuts are quick showing masculinity, representing Sherlock Holmes.
    This then contrasts in the second clip. The music is very mysterious and manly as it builds up suspense as Sherlock is walking through the empty swimming pool centre with the water glistening. The lighting is dark and intriguing. His suit is black which helps him to stand out and looks masculine. Jim is firstly seen, half behind a pole. Now his appearance is very different as he is also in a suit which an angry expression on his face looking masculine. Jim states what gun is in Sherlock’s pocket which is masculine. The long shot is used to see Jim begin to walk towards Sherlock which adds emphasis and shows Jim in a full length suit. Shot reverse shot is used as they have their conversation. Sherlock is now looking vulnerable in effect because he is holding the gun towards Jim showing he is intimidated by Jim. Jim pretends his voice is high and then on ‘point’ his voice drops deep again showing it was all an act. Suspense begins to build up. The editing is suttle as its purely a conversation. The two are portrayed extremely different in the beginning, it is then revealed they are similar as they both come across powerful and dominant in the last scene through the fight of the bomb belt. Stereotypically a fight is a masculine act. Neither party wants to back down. The end music is very upbeat and suspense and tension building getting the audience excited and wanting to watch what will happen next.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'Sherlock is having none of it' - careful this is still an essay, watch your prose. Some good points of analysis, however juxtaposition is your way in to EDITing - who has more screen time, who motivates the cuts? Good comment about the editing in the first clip about the 'gay' signs but how does this represent homosexuality - EFFEMINATE? VAIN? METROSEXUAL? For the higher marks you must make these links as at times this is rather descriptive. CAM is ignored and as such will limit your grade to L3 for examples. In the second clip whats your argument? Is it challenging stereotypes of homosexuals or is he playing with the performance of what we assume are the stereotypical act of gay? Read over before you submit and consider what you are saying about the representation of gay in your conclusion, you are capable of more if you allow yourself the time.

      AAE 14
      EX 14
      T 4 - need to make way more effort here - wearing or dressed in costume - they are not real people!

      Delete
  16. Sexuality, stereotypes and character construction used in Sherlock

    Analysing both clip 1 and 2 I have been able to see how stereotype and sexuality can be created through the use of Mise En Scene, editing, sound and camera for example:

    - In the first clip ‘What do you mean gay’ we see Sherlock and Watson portrayed in very dark and smart clothing (we are instantly given a set – up that these people are serious, business like people which is a correct assumption as they are police detectives) we also see an opposite to this very masculine portrayal in the form of the nurse who is also present in the sequence we see her wearing very light clothing (typical for nurses) and talking in a lot more of a shaky and softer tone (portrayed also in the character of Jim) we then see the entrance of another very femininely portrayed character Jim who we instantly assume is a gay man by the very ‘girly’ way he talks, the way he is dressed (very tight fitting clothing etc) this stereotype is also backed up using the sound affects, editing and camera shot (the editing is very quick and fast paced giving the audience the impression that the stereotype is correct as it is being backed up with a masculine form of editing, fast paced and quick, the sound affects are used to achieve the same thing a very masculine tone undermining our opinion and TELLING us that this man is homosexual, the camera shots also close up to these certain parts that prove he’s gay using evidence to back up there view).
    - In the second clip ‘Sherlock meets Moriarty’ we see an almost role reversal at the beginning both Sherlock and Watson are portrayed in a feminist tone (Watson has a bomb on him he’s lost his masculine power as he is faced with possible death) and Sherlock (although he seems to be in a confident state he is clueless to the situation (his stereotype of Jim is wrong and is thrown of guard) then we see some power return as Sherlock draws out a phallic symbol (the gun) however he is still in a feminine position he has no power his best friend has a bomb stuck to him and Jim has him cornered for death (Jim seems to just ‘emanate’ confidence) The use of Mise en scene is also shown in a masculine environment as it is a very dark, mysterious and foreboding environment, it created anticipation and fear in the audience (much like Jim himself) which is a masculine thing. Jim is also however portrayed in a feminine way as he is spontaneous leaving Watson and Sherlock and then returning to kill them (he says ‘Sorry boys but im just soooo changeable), which is very feministic indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big Improvement on the mock Max - but remember they are not real people so they are not in clothing they are in costume - terminology is worth 10 marks. Some relevant points to sexuality, but you must develop your answer to be explicit about how it is represented - literally: 'homosexuality is represented as... [Effeminate] or as you write 'girly'. What about the second sequence homosexuality is represented as... an act? threatening? evil? deceitful? Other than that some good points, however overly focused on gender - you must explain the link between this and stereotypes of homosexualty.
      EDITING - develop to consider juxtaposition, screen time = power and status
      CAM angles, composition, CU or LS who we are near? without these you limit your marks to level 3 for examples

      AAE 16
      EX 14
      T 4

      Delete
  17. Part 1: From viewing ‘What do you mean gay?’ it is instantly apparent that Meadows uses the moment the audience are introduced to Jim Moriaty, to suggest that he could be homosexual. The reason being is the initial thing that stands out is appearance of this character; he is wearing light coloured, fitted clothing and is groomed which is a feminine trait, therefore in juxtaposition to Sherlock who is in a more masculine black suit, his appearance leads the audience to make these assumptions of homosexuality. Furthermore, from paying close attention to the sounds surrounding this character, the ‘gay’ atmosphere is emphasised more, for instance as soon as Jim sees Sherlock, his breathing becomes heavy and fast, indicating he is attracted to Sherlock. Also, when Jim is introduced to Sherlock, the fashion in which his voice becomes high pitched similar to a female voice, when he says ‘hi’ and Sherlock’s response of ‘gay’, which is in a deep masculine voice, demonstrates further the contrast in sexuality of the two. Meadows has purposely used these two characters in order to juxtapose them, due to Jim’s apparent homosexuality and Sherlock’s heterosexuality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well done Connie, you have made the link that stereotypes of homosexuality are linked to gender expectations and opposites to masculinity. Consider though how EDIT is used to codify hetero as more powerful than homo - who motivates the cut, who is in control of the scenes edits? Sherlocks intelligence actually drives the edits. Also CAM - is there a homosexual male gaze working here? Angles, power?

      Delete
  18. Part 2:
    The second clip in which I have chosen is the ‘Sherlock meets Jim Moriaty’, where the very first instant you see Jim appear, his posture is very camp, therefore this clip contrasts the first clip. The first sound we hear is a door slamming as Sherlock enters the room, demonstrating male dominance. The music is loud and includes drums, which is a very masculine sound therefore when Sherlock is waiting for Jim, this not only creates suspense, but indicates Sherlock’s masculinity. The mise en scene in this clip, includes a gun which is phallic, symbolising that Sherlock is masculine. A long shot is used to establish the walk Jim takes towards Sherlock, which allows the audience to catch a full-length glimpse of Jim’s suit, demonstrating masculinity. This is followed by a shot reverse shot, which is used to not only show their conversation but to contrast the characters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But how has the representation of homosexuality changed here, how is it represented through Jim now? Is it just an act? Or is it as a threat, dangerous, abnormal? How is this reenforced through CAM - shot types, angles etc? If the shot rev shot is used to contrast the characters - how does this tie into sexuality? There is a lot in this that you could have explored, a pity as there are some 'ways in' you mention. Remember essays ought to have a conclusion not just end. SOUND is good and MES, more could be noted about the dialogue however. Do yourself justice and allow yourself more time - 300 words is a min.

      AAE 16
      EX 15
      T 6

      Delete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. As i was watching the clip there were many things that caught my eye on the man that walks in that ia going out with the lady.
    He is wearing a really tight top whihc shows off muscles, and his trouses are tight and ths also suggestes to men that he is wanting to show off his underwear to the male audience.
    These clothes that he is wearing dont really show to me a very strong sign of masculinty, he is not trying to impress the girl with him trying to be the alfer male in the group.
    Also when Sherlock homes says GAY the man immediatly says excuses me whihc sugests that he heard exactly what sherlock said and he is wanting him to say it again then the lady might hear then she may think twic about seeing him.
    Gay is a major sterotype which people immedalty think when they see peoples sense of dress and the way the speak they assume that a person is gay. But what i say dont judge a book by its cover.
    The way in which sherlock talks his voice is with deep and he sounds like an alfer male and JIms voice is very high pitched whihc is also a consided factor to being gay.
    The editing of the clip are very slow but when Sherlock anaysles Jim it is very fast a snappy to show that he is trying to be the better man in the group and that the girl is wasting her time.
    When he tells the girl that he thinks that he is gay is denise it and just walks out.

    This clip i think is a really good clip because it shows a man being gay and a man trying to the alfar male.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Danica, be careful with your prose when writing essays, statements such as 'But what i say dont judge a book by its cover' is not appropriate for an analysis of representation, just stick to your decoding of how homosexuality is represented as...? and how this is emphasised by the technical aspects.

      Again 'This clip i think is a really good clip because it shows a man being gay and a man trying to the alfar male.' - personals opinions about how the sequence is actually representing homosexuals is valid and important within the context of the clip, but don't not review it. This is a great opportunity here to develop this into answering the question - how is this representing homosexuality powerful, as masculine, is this challenging stereotypes - dealing with this will get you the A-B grades.

      When replying to these comments please write your response in Word, spell and grammar check then paste into the comments box as blogger may not pick up on spelling and punctuation.

      While you have addressed sound & touched on EDITING, without CAM - who has the power, gay or straight, who re we alligned with through CU who are we kept away from by LS - gay or straight, normal or 'different' this is the purpose of the essay and where the marks are awarded. without these comments of analysis you will be limiting your marks to L3.

      I think it would be useful for you to come to study support to develop your focus when writing these character comparisons and to structure an essay response - not once do you use the word 'stereotype'

      AAE 10
      EX 11
      T 3

      Delete
  21. WHAT DO YOU MEAN GAY?

    In the first clip, editing starts out very masculine, slow and methodical until Jim enters where the cuts start to pick up speed and become more erratic, a more feminine trait. Jim acts in a very camp feminine way with big swings in his hips as he walks and a higher pitched voice. Even his hand gestures are in contrast to John's, who stands very stiff and upright with his hands behind his back. Alternatively Jim hold himself and his hands very loosely. Jim's costume also reflects this as he is wearing both lightly coloured, tight fitting trousers and shirt, with the top of his pants showing. This combined with his carefully groomed hair, eyelashes and eyebrows shows an extremely metro sexual 'modern' man in contrast with both Sherlock and Watson who are wearing loose black suits that a stereotypical man would be expected to wear.


    SHELOCK MEETS MORIARTY

    The costumes in this scene reveal straight away the sexuality of Sherlock who's hair is long, scruffy and unkempt and, adding this to this is suit which is dark and, loose fitting and untidy with his top two buttons undone. Dressing like this is a very masculine trait as it shows masculinity with the smartness, but at the same time, nonconformity as he is not wearing it as it should be worn. Jim is quite the metro sexual man in the way he dresses and his stances. however He is the one with power in the scene as he could end both their lives in an instant. However Proxemic codes in this scene tell us that Sherlock has the physical power in the scene.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some good points of analysis here Kieran, but how is homosexuality represented? Threatening? Vain? Feminine? How does Jims character change? Is he really homosexual or is this an act? What about editing - how are the shots juxtaposed in the 2 scenes? What does the editing tell us about sherlock? Good point about body language compared to John - interesting point, well made. Expand your analysis out the the wider picture to consider what this says about the characters roles in the story - hetero = hero, homo = villain? Dialogue - what is said? Shots used?

      AAE 13
      EX 12
      T 4

      Delete
  22. Mise-en-scene:
    Heterosexuality and masculinity are closely link. That is why television dramas pay close detail to how a character looks. When looking Sherlock an audience would see that he does not does not pay much attention to certain details that will be seen a feminine such as perfectly styled hair this is because the character may be being represented and masculine and heterosexual. Another tell-tale sign is that his costume consists of a suit, suits are masculine and are connected with being alpha male. If a character is alpha male then his is sure to be heterosexual.
    Femininity and homosexuality are also linked. It is clear from Jim’s costume that he is Metrosexual. Meaning that he pays attention to his hair, it is styled and he uses products. He also has a more feminine way of dressing because he is wearing a fitted shirt and jeans. It is obvious that he cares about fashion which may be interpreted to present the new man.

    Sound:
    The pitches in Sherlock and Jim’s voice portray the differences in sexuality. Sherlock’s voice is manly; he has a very deep harsh voice commonly linked with heterosexuality, whereas Jim’s voice is soft, almost like a woman’s showing his homosexuality.

    Edit:
    There is use of Pace editing to show differences in sexuality also. While Jim is on scene the transitions between shots are slow, gentile and feminine. When Jim has gone and Sherlock is explain how he knows that Jim is gay there is a use of fats pace editing and Ellipsis is very masculine, the fast transitions and snappy shots may mean that Sherlock is angry because he thinks that Jim is gay, that he may not approve of homosexuality, some heterosexual mean have a problem with homosexual men because of the compromises to their masculinity.

    Words: 300

    ReplyDelete